embedded citation造句

Other articles use manually formatted footnotes or embedded citations.
Other articles use embedded citations or manually formatted footnotes.
The inline citation / reference links are embedded citations.
The fact that the source is not an embedded citation in the image is immaterial.
So why are you pushing for duplicate links by using the full embedded citation format?
It's difficult to find embedded citation in a sentence. 用embedded citation造句挺难的

Let me point out that the embedded citation guideline is just that-a guideline.
Articles look better with embedded citations.
But in any case an incomplete embedded citation is not a reason to delete an entry.
Possibly the majority of citations on wikipedia use the partially-filled-out embedded citation format.
Embedded citations that fail to include the full citation part are better than no citation and are Wikipedia : Citing sources.
For what it is worth, both Wikipedia : Bare URLs and Wikipedia : Embedded citations are essays, not guidelines or policies.
If they are used for verification, then they should be converted to an embedded citation ( no link text ) or a footnote.
I see many Wikipedia articles using " Embedded citations via numbered URLs ", that approach seems common but inferior as you describe.
It seems be a combination embedded citation / external link to a YouTube video using, which is something I've never come across before.
I dissagree with your statement that an " embedded citation in the image is immaterial . " and believe it's quite relevant to for this image.

更多例句：下一页